"Character - the balance of the inner
and the outer tendencies of existence."
Sow an act, you reap a habit; sow a habit, you
reap a character; sow a character, you reap a destiny. A good
character is, in all cases, the fruit of personal exertion.
It is not inherited from parents; it is not created by external
advantages; it is the result of one's own endeavours - the fruit
and reward of good principles manifested in the course of virtuous
and honourable action. A good heart, benevolent feelings
and a balanced mind lie as the foundation of character. It must
be capable of standing firm in the world of daily work, temptation
and trial and be able to bear the wear and tear of actual life.
My Master was always emphasizing that more than
love and devotion - which are very necessary you see - character
is necessary. In fact he quoted Lalaji who has said, "Even
the highest evolved person is not really evolved if he has no
character." It is an illusionary evolution. It is an evolution
without becoming his. It is like a man having money which he
loses and he is again without money. It is not something which
is part of you. It is not something, as the Upanishad says,
which cannot be robbed, which cannot be stolen, which cannot
be lost, which even death cannot separate us from. To make that
ours, we need the binding force of character which keeps the
spiritual content, the wealth that the Master has bestowed upon
us as ours.
You cannot borrow character from somebody like
you can borrow money. Anything that a human being values must
be his. His in such a way that it is always his. It is his during
sleep. It is his when he is awake. It is his when he is at home,
when he is abroad. No passports, no money no travelers' cheques.
These are all things which are stolen, lost, destroyed. So a
character has to be a personal character.
PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT IS NOT CHARACTER
BUILDING
Personality by definition comes from the ancient word 'persona'
meaning a mask. It was in the old Greek tragedy, when the actors
used to have masks depicting the various characters they were
playing, that we have the word 'personality', which by inherent
definition means, we are trying to appear as something we are
not. So the modern connotation, "He has a nice personality",
is a suspect word. If only, people really know what personality
means, they would not use the word so much. Because it is like
saying, "He appears rich!" Now, we don't say that
to a rich man. Or, "He appears educated!", to an educated
man. So, personality means, "He appears to be something
which he is not!" When you say a man has a good personality,
it means that: "I say, the fellow looks to be something
which he is not!" "He appears good, may be he is bad!"
So, personality by definition is something we put on outside,
which we are not inside.
So we are all parading under different masks,
and I dare say, the professional mask is one of them. When a
doctor comes home, he is no longer a doctor. He is a husband
to his wife, a father to his children, and a son of his father.
Where is this personality of the doctor? It is left at the doorstep,
you see. When he goes out, putting on his Burberry and his top
hat and his briefcase in hand, he is the doctor again. It is
like the stage - you know, a man walks onto the stage and he
is strutting. As Shakespeare said, "All the world is but
a stage, and all men and women are nothing but actors."
So personality is false. Character is truth, it
is reality, it is something you have to build from scratch.
Spiritual science says, "My dear friend, you are born as
a human being. If you are born as animal you have no choice.
There is no ability to exercise your intelligence, or your choice,
or even any selective procedures. We are subjected to instinctive
drives. An animal is not in control of itself." So try
to be human, try to be what you are inside, not flaunt yourself
outside. Do away with personality development and start with
character development.
There are two sides to our character, to our behaviour:
one, which we have as a human being and one which we have to
openly show outside in our work, in our contacts with the public,
what we call our image. Now in some professions, in some calling,
in some fields of activity, there seems to be - at least that
is the accepted public theory or feeling - the need for greater
and greater divorce between what we are and what we have to
appear to be: especially in professions or calling where an
essentially gentle person, one who is very humane in his outlook,
charitable by disposition, loving, kind, affectionate has to
put on fierce airs in the name of discipline.
Now it is my submission that it is an image, it
is a falsity and it is a lie. So, in any system where we have
been drawing upon some symbol of authority which is not inherently
in us, it is a suspicious thing. And those who depend on this
prop to their personalities, some day they are going to collapse
under situations which they would find very detrimental to their
health, wealth and most of all to their egos. Because these
things only build up our ego, without building up our character.
This is true of any situation where an individual has to fight
himself in the carrying out of his job, in the fulfillment of
his responsibilities. So spirituality says, 'integrate yourself'.
WHAT DOES CHARACTER REALLY MEAN?
It is always nice to expect from others that things should be
done for us. But I keep recollecting the old advice, "Do
unto others as you would be done by, and charity begins
at home." I think these two precepts are fundamental to
our character formation. There is a general widespread misunderstanding
that a good character means abstaining from drinking, smoking,
womanising - the three cardinal events. This is a very superficial
understanding of character.
If you come down to these precepts, that do unto others as you
would be done by, we begin to behave towards others as we would
like them to behave with us. We will not hit a man below the
belt because we don't want to be hit below the belt ourselves.
We will not rob the pocket of another because we would not like
our pocket to be picked. We would not call others names because
we don't want to be called names ourselves. It teaches us in
a more subtle way than just by giving instructions: Always tell
the truth.
Lalaji Maharaj and Babuji Maharaj have emphasised
so much on character formation. The beginning, the first step,
I would say, is to treat others as if they were you. Love them
as much as you love yourself. Love first. One who cannot love
himself, cannot love others. This is not a joke, it is the truth.
All those who talk here about the inability to love the Master,
why love a Master, love a wife, love a husband, anything? Love
is love. The object may change. One who cannot love something,
cannot love anything else, precisely because they have not love
for the self. Like charity begins at home, be charitable to
yourself, be compassionate to yourself. Can you forgive yourself
for a mistake that you have made, or you castigating yourself,
chastising yourself, feeling miserable about it. Or are you
able to say, "Forget it. You are after all a human being.
How dare you think that you are beyond the mistakes?" Are
you so perfect that you can say, "I will never make a mistake?"
Therefore, our characters have to be strengthened
progressively to go on deeper and deeper. All this tradition
of the amrita manthan of the kshira sagar, so
many things come out of it, including the famous poison, and
they had to tolerate it. It is not as if there was some ocean
of milk and they were churning it. It is our heart. We have
to churn it. This the Master does for us with his cleaning,
with his spiritual love for us, mercy for us, and we have to
be able to tolerate everything that comes.
HOW CAN CHARACTER BE BUILT?
Babuji Maharaj said, "Spirituality is my business. Character
formation is your responsibility." Spiritual science says,
Character building cannot be undertaken by just reading books:
"How to build a character by ten easy lessons" - there
are many books. Character building is a brick-by-brick process,
like we build a house. And, in that process, it is important
to realise that we are not building a personality. When a man
of character stands before you, you don't need to say, "He
is a man of personality". Often, they have no personality
whatsoever. If they just slip out of this room, you wouldn't
even recognise them. I know because my Master was like that
- a man in a simple dhoti and a simple kurta;
if he walked out on the street, you could not distinguish him
from anybody else! Because character is not something, which
is external. It may be reflected in your activities and your
words, yes. But it does not show on you face. It does not show
in the way that you are dressed. It is like the sunlight. You
know, the sun is not aware that it is shining. A man of character
has not even the awareness that he is a man of character.
It shines in everything that he does. Therefore such people
attract, like, they say, the moth to the candle. You cannot
possibly accuse or praise the candle for attracting the insect;
it is what it is, and being responsive to what it is, the rest
of the insect life flocks to it. We flock to the light when
we are in darkness. The truth behind the spiritual statement
is: "Be yourself, and you will achieve much more than flaunting
a false personality."
When a child takes a fly and rips off its wings,
you can hardly accuse the child of being evil. You can say there
is something in its nature, in its inner tendencies, which gives
it this destructive tendency. Some children are always throwing
cricket balls and tennis balls and breaking the neighbour's
windows. So, that is where you know, the character building
comes, precisely because we come here with a balance-sheet,
where the tendencies of the past inhere in me, as what we call
samskaras. And, if they are necessary to be developed,
we allow them to be developed. If not, they are removed. Like
you know in a lawn we remove the unnecessary grass, and what
grass is to grow, it is allowed to grow. So character essentially
is this aspect.
When we do cleaning and we remove the samskaras
and our different personalities fall off bit by bit, which we
call change in character - aggressiveness goes, greed goes,
lust goes. One by one, all these samskaras go and our personality
changes. It is as if peeling an onion. You take off skin after
skin. You can say it is the peeling of the personality. What
is the result? When everything is taken from the onion, what
is the result? We can say, nothing. But when we take away everything
from ourselves, what is the result? I think we reveal what is
within.
At each moment we must reexamine our internal
and external selves. Try to weed out the shortcomings by cleaning,
take the preceptor's assistance, or write to the Master, whatever
you have to do. And make sure that we are free from internal
and external shortcomings. Internal and external shortcomings
are removed. Now comes the time for a positive buildup of character.
I have stopped lying, but have I started telling the truth?
So the negative must go and the positive must come in its place.
Otherwise there is a vacuum. So that is not desirable.
Character building is the duty of the abhyasi
and, therefore, of the preceptor too. We have to build our own
characters. The Master creates the inner condition. We have
to allow it to express itself in our life. And expressing it
in our life means behaving rationally, behaving with courtesy,
behaving with generosity, behaving with love. Eventually one
hopes that we should all become like the Master himself - no
longer expressing love but being love.
We may have problems which we may not be willing
to discuss with another preceptor or abhyasi. We may be so ashamed
that we cannot talk to anybody else. But there is a saying that
before one's tailor, one's lawyer and one's doctor there can
be no shame. I would add that before one's Master there can
be no sense of anything at all, neither of shame, nor pride,
nor of any such thing. Surrender implies that we go to the Master
with those problems which we cannot solve ourselves. But this
does not in any way remove our responsibility to correct ourselves.
After all, drunkenness and immorality are easily cured. As they
are easily acquired, so also they can be easily lost. So the
duty of an abhyasi is to try to correct himself or herself.
But where we are not able to do it, we should go to the Master
and pray for his guidance, and pray that he may correct us by
changing our behaviour and our character. It is Master's duty
to do this for us when we are sincere in our approach.
HOW DO WE EVALUATE A PERSON'S CHARACTER?
How does prejudice develop? By what are we conditioned in our
interpersonal relationships? The answer to all these questions
is that a man's antecedents are what guide us. If we can develop
the ability to look on a person at this instant as a fresh,
unknown entity, unconditioned by any past, then we will develop
the capacity to see the real person, and not merely the external,
tortured human being that everybody sees. Then an objective
ability develops, which penetrates beyond the external veils
and sees the truth within. A person's past may have been anything.
What is he now? This is the most important thing. But we, most
of us, rarely ask this question because we are preeminently
worried only about the past antecedents. Thus we miss the real
person and see only a tangled and superficial web of trivialities
enclosing the individual like a fly in a spider's web. This
is why all new acquaintances are so glamorous, so welcome, while
old friends are the ones with whom we quarrel and from whom
we often part. Living in the present unites us, while living
in the past can tend to separate person from person and, as
history records for us, even nation from nation.
TRANSCEND CHARACTER AS WELL
Character is again something pertaining to the temporal life
- life in this world, in the world of mutual relationships.
Light is needed when there is darkness. If you go by what the
Vedas say, at the time of Creation, there was neither sunlight
nor darkness. It was a state like dawn. No heat, no cold. No
light, no darkness, no 'dwandwas' as we call it, no dualities.
So the Ultimate spiritual effort is to bring that into our life.
When there is no personality, there is no character.
When we come to a still higher level of character, there is
something called INTEGRITY. Integrity means, "Being
true to yourself". Being true to your values at any
cost. I must uphold my truth as I see it. May be it is wrong
today. But I prayerfully do it. Because you know if you study
the lives of great men, even politicians, like President Abraham
Lincoln for instance, he used to meditate before he took any
major decision. He did not consult his cabinet. He meditated
in the knowledge, in the wisdom, that essentially the decision
is his. The inner voice is infallible, it is ever true.
So, transcending character comes integrity. Because
you find sometimes men of character also misbehave. It can be
a momentary passion or momentary misdeed. The law recognises
that a premeditated murder is not treated in the same way as
an unpremeditated murder. One is hanged and the other gets a
life-sentence. So, that is a moment of passion. Viswamitra is
another example. He was a saint, a rishi, but at the
moment of meditation a Menaka came along, something in him responded
to her presence, and the whole thing after it.
So, character is the ability to make decisions,
after examining the pros and cons. Integrity gives you the ability
to do it. If morality and moral values are instilled in you
then you transfer the ability and the need to judge also to
Him to whom you have given room in your heart. Now I am only
an instrument. So there is no question of doer-ship, there is
no question of culpability, because 'I' am no longer acting,
'I' am no longer doing, 'I' am also no longer responsible. This
is the final stage of surrender. Then the body is just moving
like a puppet in the hands of a puppeteer. He who is inside
me, is making me move and act and do whatever is to be done.
And largely the saints are supposed to be like that, they are
unconscious of what they say, they are unconscious of what they
do. They respond to the situation in the most unique way because
such actions are never repeated.
So, the first need is the moral values. The second need is integrity.
The third is character. Fourth is the strength of will to enable
me to go ahead with what I decide as right, notwithstanding
the circumstances.
"In the hands of a man of character,
power is good. In the hands of a man of character, wealth is
good. Everything is good in the hands of a man of character."